Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-07-14 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-07-14 Senate Journal Page 3769 SB 78 Message dated and received May 10, stating: Dear President Pearce: Under the authority of art. II, sec. 15 of the Alaska Constitution, I have vetoed the following bill: SENATE BILL NO. 78 am H An Act relating to the use and prescription of pharmaceutical agents in the practice of optometry. This bill grants broad authority for optometrists in Alaska to prescribe pharmaceutical agents relating to treatment of the eye, including oral and injectable drugs. This greatly expands optometrists' scope of practice regarding pharmaceuticals, which is now limited to the use of topical drugs. 2000-07-14 Senate Journal Page 3770 SB 78 I recognize the fact that many states currently allow optometrists to prescribe oral drugs. Fewer states have expanded this privilege to include the use of injectable drugs. I also recognize that a few states have recently rejected this proposed expansion of optometrist privileges, citing concern for enlarging the scope of practice without adequate training and education. I share this concern. I have faith that the Alaska State Board of Examiners in Optometry would do its best to regulate this new authority and would intend to require new testing of its licensees before granting this expanded license endorsement. However, the bill does not specifically require any new testing. Without a regulation change, under the language of this law, a licensee with a current endorsement to administer topical drugs would automatically be licensed to prescribe oral drugs and administer injected drugs. The Legislature never sought the opinion of the medical community and, specifically, the Medical Board, when considering this bill. That was a failure to recognize this as a medical and health issue. The bill asks the Board of Optometry to solicit the recommendations of the State Medical Board in establishing its examination and education requirements for the pharmaceutical license endorsement. Despite this effort to involve the medical community in this process, members of the Alaska State Medical Board unanimously oppose this legislation, stating: Optometrists do not have the clinical experience to safely administer eye injections, intravenous and intramuscular injections, and oral medications, including some narcotics. Reading about the effect and side effects of medications, or attending seminars, does not prepare an optometrist for complications related to patients' other medical problems and chronic medications. The board's charge is to protect Alaskan patients; we believe that this legislation would endanger patients. 2000-07-14 Senate Journal Page 3771 SB 78 While I have high regard for the optometry profession in Alaska, I must, in the interest of public health and safety, heed the recommendation of the medical community and veto this bill. However, I remain open to the concept of expanding optometrists scope of practice regarding pharmaceuticals, provided we can determine the appropriate perimeters of such a law and ensure the public safety in granting any expanded privileges. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor